format
JPEG
JPEG is the lossy photographic image format that cameras, phones and websites default to.
Also known as JPG, Joint Photographic Experts Group.
Convert a file nowWhat is a JPEG file?
A lossy raster format tuned for continuous-tone photographs, trading detail the eye is unlikely to notice for very small files.
JPEG splits an image into 8×8 blocks, transforms each with a discrete cosine transform and quantises the result according to a quality setting. Because quantisation is irreversible, JPEG is lossy and every re-save degrades the picture a little further.
Technical characteristics
- Representation
- binary
- Compression
- DCT, Huffman coding
- Lossy
- Yes
- Transparency
- No
- Animation
- No
- Typical size
- 0.1–5 MB for a camera photo
- Limits
- 65,535 × 65,535 pixels
- File signature
- FF D8 FF
- Open specification
- Yes
History and origin
- Introduced
- 1992
- Organisation
- Joint Photographic Experts Group / ITU-T
- 1992ITU-T T.81 published
- 1994JFIF becomes the de facto container
- 2000JPEG 2000 released as a separate, less-adopted successor
Compatibility
- Windowsfull
- macOSfull
- Linuxfull
- Androidfull
- iOSfull
Browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge.
Applications: Photoshop, GIMP, Affinity Photo, Microsoft Word, Google Docs.
Advantages of JPEG
- Extremely small files for photographs
- Adjustable quality dial from near-lossless to tiny
- Universal support across every device and application
Limitations to know about
- No transparency channel
- Visible artefacts around text, logos and hard edges
- Generation loss on every re-save
When to use JPEG
- Camera photos
- Web imagery
- Email attachments
Best practices
- Export at quality 80–90 for the web; higher rarely looks different
- Keep a lossless master and export JPEGs from it
Common mistakes
- Saving screenshots or logos as JPEG, which blurs text
- Repeatedly editing and re-saving the same JPEG
Convert JPEG files
Convert from the highest-quality JPEG you have. Re-encoding an already-compressed JPEG compounds artefacts.
Recommended next step
Convert to WebP
WebP delivers the same perceived quality as JPEG at about a third less bandwidth and is supported by every current browser.
Trade-offs: Encoding is slower than JPEG; Print workflows may still expect JPEG.
Learn about WebP
JPEG scores
Deterministic scores calculated from the structured facts above. Identical facts always produce identical scores.
Overall score
75/100
Compatibility score
100- every major browser engine renders it natively
- Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS all open it without extra software
- a broad range of applications read and write it
- an open specification means cloud SDKs can implement it without licensing friction
Confidence 82% · evidence coverage 100%
Openness score
100- the specification is published openly
- an openly specified format can be implemented without a licence negotiation
Confidence 91% · evidence coverage 100%
Streaming score
88- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
- every major browser engine renders it natively
Confidence 77% · evidence coverage 63%
Performance score
88- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
Confidence 73% · evidence coverage 100%
Web score
87- browsers render it natively, so no conversion step is needed at request time
- every major browser engine renders it natively
- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
- it has no transparency, so transparent areas are flattened onto a solid colour
Confidence 83% · evidence coverage 100%
AI score
86- open specifications are implemented by the open-source decoders that ML stacks rely on
- the specification is published openly
- a broad range of applications read and write it
- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
Confidence 73% · evidence coverage 100%
Archiving score
79- the specification is published openly
- the specification is public, so a decoder can always be rebuilt
- it is actively maintained and current
- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
Confidence 87% · evidence coverage 100%
Longevity score
77- the specification is published openly
- it is actively maintained and current
- the specification is public, so a decoder can always be rebuilt
- it sits at the centre of the format ecosystem, with many documented relationships
Confidence 90% · evidence coverage 100%
Editing score
66- a broad range of applications read and write it
- colour profiles travel with the file, keeping the pipeline colour-managed
- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
- it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss
Confidence 66% · evidence coverage 100%
Photography score
64- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
- colour profiles travel with the file, keeping the pipeline colour-managed
- it opens by double-clicking on every mainstream device
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
- it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss
Confidence 69% · evidence coverage 100%
Printing score
55- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
- a broad range of applications read and write it
- it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss
Confidence 74% · evidence coverage 100%
What JPEG is recommended for
Every conclusion below is derived from the structured facts on this page — nothing is written by hand.
Browser compatibility100/100
- Because every major browser engine renders it natively.
- Because at least one shipping browser renders it.
Operating system compatibility100/100
- Because Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS all open it without extra software.
- Because most platforms handle it natively.
Software compatibility100/100
- Because a broad range of applications read and write it.
- Because several mainstream applications support it.
Web suitability100/100
- Because browsers render it natively, so no conversion step is needed at request time.
- Because lossy compression keeps transfer sizes and Core Web Vitals in check.
- Because the specification is open, so tooling and CDNs implement it freely.
Cloud compatibility100/100
- Because an open specification means cloud SDKs can implement it without licensing friction.
- Because it converts into many other formats, which suits automated pipelines.
Everyday consumer usage100/100
- Because it opens by double-clicking on every mainstream device.
- Because small files are easy to email, message and upload.
- Because it is a current format that people and services still expect.
Metadata support100/100
- Because it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata.
- Because it embeds colour-profile metadata.
Open standards100/100
- Because the specification is published openly.
- Because an official specification document is publicly reachable.
Licensing100/100
- Because an openly specified format can be implemented without a licence negotiation.
- Because the core patents are old enough to have expired.
Popularity100/100
- Because it sits at the centre of the format ecosystem, with many documented relationships.
- Because mainstream applications ship support for it.
- Because every mainstream operating system handles it.
Decode performance100/100
- Because smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint.
- Because mature formats benefit from hardware and SIMD-optimised decoders.
Compression efficiency69/100
- Because it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding.
- Because it defines a documented compression scheme.
What JPEG is not recommended for
Transparency0/100
- Because it has no transparency, so transparent areas are flattened onto a solid colour.
- Because it has no alpha channel, so edges cannot fade smoothly.
Animation0/100
- Because it is a single-frame format and cannot animate.
Image quality33/100
- Because it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss.
Migration paths
JPEG → WebP
Transparency improves by 100 points because it supports transparency.
Trade-off: Licensing drops by 33 points because it does not satisfy: the core patents are old enough to have expired.
Convert JPEG to WebP
Successors and legacy considerations
Superseded by: WebP.
WebP supersedes it in new work.
Related to JPEG
Media types
Key concepts
Alternatives
Supported by
Specified by
Compression used
Succeeds
Frequently asked questions
Is JPG the same as JPEG?
- Yes. The three-letter form exists only because early Windows filesystems limited extensions to three characters.
Can a JPEG have a transparent background?
- No. JPEG has no alpha channel, so transparency is flattened onto a solid colour. Use PNG, WebP or AVIF instead.
Data quality
Every claim on this page is classified as a verified fact, a derived fact or an assumption.
- Overall confidence
- 96%
- Verification status
- verified
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-03
- Verified facts
- 3
3 classified claims backed by 2 sources.
Sources and review status
Review status: verified · confidence 95%
Last reviewed 2026-08-03 (revision 1).