format
WebP
WebP is Google's web image format offering lossy and lossless modes with alpha.
Convert a file nowWhat is a WebP file?
A modern web image format that covers JPEG's and PNG's use cases in one file type, typically 25–35% smaller than either.
Technical characteristics
- Representation
- binary
- Compression
- VP8 intra (lossy), WebP lossless
- Lossy
- Yes
- Transparency
- Yes
- Animation
- Yes
- File signature
- 52 49 46 46 .. .. .. .. 57 45 42 50
- Open specification
- Yes
History and origin
- Introduced
- 2010
- Created by
- 2010Announced by Google, lossy only
- 2012Lossless and alpha support added
- 2020Safari 14 completes browser support
- 2024Standardised as RFC 9649
Compatibility
- Windowsfull
- macOSfull
- Linuxfull
- Androidfull
- iOSfull
Browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari 14+, Edge.
Applications: Photoshop 23+, GIMP, Figma, Affinity.
Advantages of WebP
- One format for photos, graphics, transparency and animation
- Roughly a third smaller than equivalent JPEG or PNG
- Supported by every current browser
Limitations to know about
- Older desktop applications and some print workflows still reject it
- Animation tooling is weaker than GIF's ecosystem
When to use WebP
- Website imagery
- App assets
- Replacing animated GIFs
Convert WebP files
Lossless WebP replaces PNG cleanly; lossy WebP replaces JPEG at similar visual quality.
WebP scores
Deterministic scores calculated from the structured facts above. Identical facts always produce identical scores.
Overall score
84/100
Compatibility score
100- every major browser engine renders it natively
- Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS all open it without extra software
- a broad range of applications read and write it
- an open specification means cloud SDKs can implement it without licensing friction
Confidence 82% · evidence coverage 100%
Web score
95- browsers render it natively, so no conversion step is needed at request time
- every major browser engine renders it natively
- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
Confidence 82% · evidence coverage 100%
Streaming score
88- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
- every major browser engine renders it natively
Confidence 76% · evidence coverage 63%
Performance score
88- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
Confidence 72% · evidence coverage 100%
Openness score
87- the specification is published openly
- an openly specified format can be implemented without a licence negotiation
Confidence 90% · evidence coverage 100%
AI score
86- open specifications are implemented by the open-source decoders that ML stacks rely on
- the specification is published openly
- a broad range of applications read and write it
- smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
Confidence 73% · evidence coverage 100%
Longevity score
81- it is actively maintained and current
- the specification is published openly
- the specification is public, so a decoder can always be rebuilt
- it sits at the centre of the format ecosystem, with many documented relationships
Confidence 89% · evidence coverage 100%
Archiving score
78- the specification is published openly
- the specification is public, so a decoder can always be rebuilt
- it is actively maintained and current
- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
Confidence 86% · evidence coverage 100%
Editing score
66- a broad range of applications read and write it
- colour profiles travel with the file, keeping the pipeline colour-managed
- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
- it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss
Confidence 66% · evidence coverage 100%
Photography score
64- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
- colour profiles travel with the file, keeping the pipeline colour-managed
- it opens by double-clicking on every mainstream device
- it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
- it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss
Confidence 68% · evidence coverage 100%
Printing score
55- it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
- a broad range of applications read and write it
- it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss
Confidence 73% · evidence coverage 100%
What WebP is recommended for
Every conclusion below is derived from the structured facts on this page — nothing is written by hand.
Transparency100/100
- Because it supports transparency.
- Because it stores a full alpha channel, allowing soft edges and partial opacity.
Animation100/100
- Because it stores multiple frames, so animation is supported natively.
Browser compatibility100/100
- Because every major browser engine renders it natively.
- Because at least one shipping browser renders it.
Operating system compatibility100/100
- Because Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS all open it without extra software.
- Because most platforms handle it natively.
Software compatibility100/100
- Because a broad range of applications read and write it.
- Because several mainstream applications support it.
Web suitability100/100
- Because browsers render it natively, so no conversion step is needed at request time.
- Because lossy compression keeps transfer sizes and Core Web Vitals in check.
- Because the specification is open, so tooling and CDNs implement it freely.
Cloud compatibility100/100
- Because an open specification means cloud SDKs can implement it without licensing friction.
- Because it converts into many other formats, which suits automated pipelines.
Everyday consumer usage100/100
- Because it opens by double-clicking on every mainstream device.
- Because small files are easy to email, message and upload.
- Because it is a current format that people and services still expect.
Metadata support100/100
- Because it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata.
- Because it embeds colour-profile metadata.
Open standards100/100
- Because the specification is published openly.
- Because an official specification document is publicly reachable.
Popularity100/100
- Because it sits at the centre of the format ecosystem, with many documented relationships.
- Because mainstream applications ship support for it.
- Because every mainstream operating system handles it.
Decode performance100/100
- Because smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint.
- Because mature formats benefit from hardware and SIMD-optimised decoders.
Future-proofing75/100
- Because it is actively maintained and current.
- Because open specifications outlive the companies that create them.
- Because it is a modern design rather than a legacy carry-over.
Compression efficiency69/100
- Because it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding.
- Because it defines a documented compression scheme.
What WebP is not recommended for
Image quality33/100
- Because it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss.
Migration paths
WebP → PNG
Image quality improves by 67 points because it is lossless, so decoding returns the original pixels exactly.
Trade-off: Animation drops by 100 points because it is a single-frame format and cannot animate.
Convert WebP to PNGWebP → JPEG
Licensing improves by 33 points because an openly specified format can be implemented without a licence negotiation.
Trade-off: Transparency drops by 100 points because it has no transparency, so transparent areas are flattened onto a solid colour.
Convert WebP to JPEG
Successors and legacy considerations
Related to WebP
File extensions
Media types
Supported by
Created by
Specified by
Frequently asked questions
Should I use WebP or AVIF?
- WebP for the widest compatibility and fast encoding; AVIF when you want the smallest possible file and can accept slower encoding.
Data quality
Every claim on this page is classified as a verified fact, a derived fact or an assumption.
- Overall confidence
- 95%
- Verification status
- verified
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-03
- Verified facts
- 3
3 classified claims backed by 2 sources.
- RFC 9649 — WebP Image Format — IETF
- Image file type and format guide — MDN Web Docs
Sources and review status
Review status: verified · confidence 95%
Last reviewed 2026-08-03 (revision 1).
- RFC 9649 — WebP Image Format — IETF
- Image file type and format guide — MDN Web Docs