format

WebP

WebP is Google's web image format offering lossy and lossless modes with alpha.

Convert a file now

What is a WebP file?

A modern web image format that covers JPEG's and PNG's use cases in one file type, typically 25–35% smaller than either.

Technical characteristics

Representation
binary
Compression
VP8 intra (lossy), WebP lossless
Lossy
Yes
Transparency
Yes
Animation
Yes
File signature
52 49 46 46 .. .. .. .. 57 45 42 50
Open specification
Yes

History and origin

Introduced
2010
Created by
Google
  1. 2010Announced by Google, lossy only
  2. 2012Lossless and alpha support added
  3. 2020Safari 14 completes browser support
  4. 2024Standardised as RFC 9649

Compatibility

  • Windowsfull
  • macOSfull
  • Linuxfull
  • Androidfull
  • iOSfull

Browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari 14+, Edge.

Applications: Photoshop 23+, GIMP, Figma, Affinity.

Advantages of WebP

  • One format for photos, graphics, transparency and animation
  • Roughly a third smaller than equivalent JPEG or PNG
  • Supported by every current browser

Limitations to know about

  • Older desktop applications and some print workflows still reject it
  • Animation tooling is weaker than GIF's ecosystem

When to use WebP

  • Website imagery
  • App assets
  • Replacing animated GIFs

Convert WebP files

Lossless WebP replaces PNG cleanly; lossy WebP replaces JPEG at similar visual quality.

WebP scores

Deterministic scores calculated from the structured facts above. Identical facts always produce identical scores.

Overall score

84/100

  • Compatibility score

    100
    • every major browser engine renders it natively
    • Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS all open it without extra software
    • a broad range of applications read and write it
    • an open specification means cloud SDKs can implement it without licensing friction

    Confidence 82% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Web score

    95
    • browsers render it natively, so no conversion step is needed at request time
    • every major browser engine renders it natively
    • smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
    • it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding

    Confidence 82% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Streaming score

    88
    • smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
    • it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
    • every major browser engine renders it natively

    Confidence 76% · evidence coverage 63%

  • Performance score

    88
    • smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint
    • it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding

    Confidence 72% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Openness score

    87
    • the specification is published openly
    • an openly specified format can be implemented without a licence negotiation

    Confidence 90% · evidence coverage 100%

  • AI score

    86
    • open specifications are implemented by the open-source decoders that ML stacks rely on
    • the specification is published openly
    • a broad range of applications read and write it
    • smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint

    Confidence 73% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Longevity score

    81
    • it is actively maintained and current
    • the specification is published openly
    • the specification is public, so a decoder can always be rebuilt
    • it sits at the centre of the format ecosystem, with many documented relationships

    Confidence 89% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Archiving score

    78
    • the specification is published openly
    • the specification is public, so a decoder can always be rebuilt
    • it is actively maintained and current
    • it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata

    Confidence 86% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Editing score

    66
    • a broad range of applications read and write it
    • colour profiles travel with the file, keeping the pipeline colour-managed
    • it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
    • it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss

    Confidence 66% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Photography score

    64
    • it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
    • colour profiles travel with the file, keeping the pipeline colour-managed
    • it opens by double-clicking on every mainstream device
    • it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding
    • it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss

    Confidence 68% · evidence coverage 100%

  • Printing score

    55
    • it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata
    • a broad range of applications read and write it
    • it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss

    Confidence 73% · evidence coverage 100%

Every conclusion below is derived from the structured facts on this page — nothing is written by hand.

  • Transparency100/100

    • Because it supports transparency.
    • Because it stores a full alpha channel, allowing soft edges and partial opacity.
  • Animation100/100

    • Because it stores multiple frames, so animation is supported natively.
  • Browser compatibility100/100

    • Because every major browser engine renders it natively.
    • Because at least one shipping browser renders it.
  • Operating system compatibility100/100

    • Because Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS all open it without extra software.
    • Because most platforms handle it natively.
  • Software compatibility100/100

    • Because a broad range of applications read and write it.
    • Because several mainstream applications support it.
  • Web suitability100/100

    • Because browsers render it natively, so no conversion step is needed at request time.
    • Because lossy compression keeps transfer sizes and Core Web Vitals in check.
    • Because the specification is open, so tooling and CDNs implement it freely.
  • Cloud compatibility100/100

    • Because an open specification means cloud SDKs can implement it without licensing friction.
    • Because it converts into many other formats, which suits automated pipelines.
  • Everyday consumer usage100/100

    • Because it opens by double-clicking on every mainstream device.
    • Because small files are easy to email, message and upload.
    • Because it is a current format that people and services still expect.
  • Metadata support100/100

    • Because it carries EXIF-style embedded metadata.
    • Because it embeds colour-profile metadata.
  • Open standards100/100

    • Because the specification is published openly.
    • Because an official specification document is publicly reachable.
  • Popularity100/100

    • Because it sits at the centre of the format ecosystem, with many documented relationships.
    • Because mainstream applications ship support for it.
    • Because every mainstream operating system handles it.
  • Decode performance100/100

    • Because smaller payloads mean less I/O and faster first paint.
    • Because mature formats benefit from hardware and SIMD-optimised decoders.
  • Future-proofing75/100

    • Because it is actively maintained and current.
    • Because open specifications outlive the companies that create them.
    • Because it is a modern design rather than a legacy carry-over.
  • Compression efficiency69/100

    • Because it compresses lossily, which produces much smaller files than lossless coding.
    • Because it defines a documented compression scheme.
  • Image quality33/100

    • Because it discards detail during encoding, and every re-save compounds the loss.

Migration paths

  • WebPPNG

    Image quality improves by 67 points because it is lossless, so decoding returns the original pixels exactly.

    Trade-off: Animation drops by 100 points because it is a single-frame format and cannot animate.

    Convert WebP to PNG
  • WebPJPEG

    Licensing improves by 33 points because an openly specified format can be implemented without a licence negotiation.

    Trade-off: Transparency drops by 100 points because it has no transparency, so transparent areas are flattened onto a solid colour.

    Convert WebP to JPEG

Successors and legacy considerations

Superseded by: AVIF.

Supersedes: JPEG.

AVIF supersedes it in new work.

Frequently asked questions

Should I use WebP or AVIF?

WebP for the widest compatibility and fast encoding; AVIF when you want the smallest possible file and can accept slower encoding.

Data quality

Every claim on this page is classified as a verified fact, a derived fact or an assumption.

Overall confidence
95%
Verification status
verified
Last reviewed
2026-08-03
Verified facts
3

3 classified claims backed by 2 sources.

Sources and review status

Review status: verified · confidence 95%

Last reviewed 2026-08-03 (revision 1).